I’m not about to rewatch the recent final just to confirm the exact court positioning (I’m sure the stats are out there), but it looked like both players were pressing up on the baseline quite a bit. When that happens—especially when they’re tight to or even inside the baseline—ball speed really starts to matter. The closer you are, the less time your opponent has to react, so those numbers become far more impactful than when players are trading from deeper behind the baseline, like Zverev and Musetti.
Jim, thanks for your reply. Interesting what you said about measuring a player's speed versus judging a player by what ‘looks’ quick to the eye. Tennis movement is unusually specific in my view, but I generally judge tennis speed in three areas: short distance (bursts), medium distance, and the expanse. Player’s who are quick over the expanse tend to grab all the headlines; think Carlos and Monfils. I’d take Novak and Borg over the medium distances. Believe or not I would take McEnroe over short distances—he’s a distant memory to most of us now but his speed around the net was quite exceptional; he was quick in his head. Overall I would take Roger. He moved so beautifully in all three departments.
Jim, thanks for your reply. Interesting what you said about measuring a player's speed versus judging a player by what ‘looks’ quick to the eye. Tennis movement is unusually specific in my view, but I generally judge tennis speed in three areas: short distance (bursts), medium distance, and the expanse. Player’s who are quick over the expanse tend to grab all the headlines; think Carlos and Monfils. I’d take Novak and Borg over the medium distances. Believe or not I would take McEnroe over short distances—he’s a distant memory to most of us now but his speed around the net was quite exceptional; he was quick in his head. Overall I would take Roger. He moved so beautifully in all three departments.

Posted that before I read the article ... which is great! Serendipity.

Comment