Guess we are really comparing apples with oranges: in the old days, everything was biased to favor serve and volley. The champs of the distant past, if they played as they did then, would not be able to dominate since the emphasis is on prolonged rallies,ie quality of groundstrokes. Same as the champs of today, playing as they do today, would not be able to dominate since the quality of the volleys today has deteriorated.
And, of course, add the related bias to a certain style of play caused by courts/balls/rackets/strings...
The unanswered question is how would the champs of yesteryear, growing up in this era, have evolved and would they still dominate? And viceversa.
And, of course, add the related bias to a certain style of play caused by courts/balls/rackets/strings...
The unanswered question is how would the champs of yesteryear, growing up in this era, have evolved and would they still dominate? And viceversa.

Comment