Grand Sam: Samantha Stosur’s Serve Motion

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • John Yandell
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2005
    • 6883

    #1

    Grand Sam: Samantha Stosur’s Serve Motion

    Let us hear your thoughts on Tom Down's article "Grand Sam: Samantha Stosur’s Serve Motion"
  • captnemo
    Guest
    • Jul 2010
    • 42

    #2
    Very glad I never had to practice in the juniors with Sam Stosur...beating up on male junior contemporaries I think was probably way better for her than the "opponents..."

    Comment

    • stroke
      Senior Member
      • Jan 2006
      • 5156

      #3
      No doubt that Sam has the best serve in women's tennis to me. I have heard some folks easy that Serena's is the best in women's tennis, but it is clear to me that Sam has way more action on her ball. I think the comparison with Pete was appropriate, particularly from a ball produced standpoint, but Sam certainly does not have the relaxed type motion of Pete or Roger. It is a very physical motion. It would be very interesting to see her speed/spin ratio on her 2nd serve vs Roger.

      Comment

      • bottle
        Guest
        • Mar 2005
        • 6472

        #4
        One possibly useful thing apparent in the video is the way her racket keeps working to outside right up to the instant that her upper arm becomes vertical, pointing at the sky.

        Comment

        • bottle
          Guest
          • Mar 2005
          • 6472

          #5
          Scapular Catapult

          Holy mother of Bo Jangles! If Samantha Stosur's upper arm gets vertical just as her racket stops loading out to her right, then her contact with the ball must, of necessity, be with arm slanted to the front since time will have elapsed.

          But elbow could still be flying toward the sky through the magic of scapular catapult.

          This configuration of frozen contact could bear out Rod Cross's contention that hitting up back of the ball is physical impossibility at full extension-- a vast Australian conspiracy to hit forward aCROSS the top of the ball.

          Last edited by bottle; 12-03-2012, 05:16 AM.

          Comment

          • stotty
            Senior Member
            • Jan 2009
            • 6630

            #6
            Originally posted by bottle

            This configuration of frozen contact could bear out Rod Cross's contention that hitting up back of the ball is physical impossibility at full extension

            https://www.tennisplayer.net/articles/
            At full extension, yes. Who would say otherwise?
            Stotty

            Comment

            • bottle
              Guest
              • Mar 2005
              • 6472

              #7
              Deluded persons.

              Comment

              Who's Online

              Collapse

              There are currently 13665 users online. 18 members and 13647 guests.

              Most users ever online was 183,544 at 03:22 AM on 03-17-2025.

              Working...