What are the advantages and disadvantages of following-through like Pete Sampras (more classic style a la your Visual Tennis book) or following-through like Roger Federer (more modern style) on a forehand? Does one style give you more topspin? More power? More consistency? I noticed some players do both at different times? It seems like the majority of women finish with a more classic style and swing path and the men finish with the more modern style? Is that true? If so why? The differences in grips alone can’t account for this because Roger’s grip is closer to Pete’s grip then it is to Roddick’s grip yet Federer and Roddick have a similar follow-through. Also, this has to be intentional and not a result of just hitting through the ball and letting your arm go where it may as some authors suggest. If that was the case then Pete would end up with a follow-through like Roger’s a lot of the time and visa versa. But you don’t see that. There follow-throughs are consistently the same every time regardless of where the ball is at impact and where they end up hitting the ball.
https://www.tennisplayer.net/tp_player/roger-federer/
https://www.tennisplayer.net/tp_player/pete-sampras/
https://www.tennisplayer.net/tp_player/roger-federer/
https://www.tennisplayer.net/tp_player/pete-sampras/

Comment