Nuts? Maybe dysfunctional. Who isn't? He's on stage for everyone to look at him through the microscope and of course everyone likes to play psychologist. One thing about him is that he isn't "cookie cutter" mindset. Lots of tennis purists like to see the behaviour within 3 sigma. Within the control limits. But with Nick "The Jerk" Kyrgios you are going to be hard pressed to reign him in. Some of his antics I can do without. Those that suggest a lack of effort are the most galling. Some of the hot dogging I can do without. But that is a sign of the times. As you say...sports are entertainment now. So...who's to blame? Nick didn't discover the hotdog. But in tennis he is taking it to another level.
I only got to see a few points of the highlights. It was apparent that he had his head into the match and his goal was to win. Not sure why he cannot seem to muster the effort night in and night out. Although all indicators are that this week he has done just that. He mentioned in an article that he was getting help in this regard. That's a good thing. Tsitsipas is a good rival as his behaviour is usually exemplary. It is often the contrast in life that keeps it "entertaining" and prevents us from dozing off from boredom. I think that it was a good match for Stefanos. Nick is a bit older and more physically mature. I was wondering if he just might bully over Tsitsipas. Apparently not. But from all indications Tsitsipas competed well and that is what I am looking for in this young man as he matures...that ability to bring it night in and night out. Still I wonder if that serve doesn't need a bit of a tweaking. At his height there is no reason why he cannot rock that pill. Much as Kyrgios does. He can bully nearly anyone with his serve and play to the tie-breaker. That is his given tactic on his lesser nights.
I have been saying for a long, long time that the match of the day is Roger Federer versus Anybody. It's nice to know that at least on a given night that Nick can keep it together mentally and give the crowd what they are paying for. In this case he has done it all week...against albeit lesser players. But now is the moment of truth. He is up against an opponent who has the capability to playing like an immovable object. It will be interesting to see which Nick shows up. Dr. Jekyl or Mr. Hyde.
I only got to see a few points of the highlights. It was apparent that he had his head into the match and his goal was to win. Not sure why he cannot seem to muster the effort night in and night out. Although all indicators are that this week he has done just that. He mentioned in an article that he was getting help in this regard. That's a good thing. Tsitsipas is a good rival as his behaviour is usually exemplary. It is often the contrast in life that keeps it "entertaining" and prevents us from dozing off from boredom. I think that it was a good match for Stefanos. Nick is a bit older and more physically mature. I was wondering if he just might bully over Tsitsipas. Apparently not. But from all indications Tsitsipas competed well and that is what I am looking for in this young man as he matures...that ability to bring it night in and night out. Still I wonder if that serve doesn't need a bit of a tweaking. At his height there is no reason why he cannot rock that pill. Much as Kyrgios does. He can bully nearly anyone with his serve and play to the tie-breaker. That is his given tactic on his lesser nights.
I have been saying for a long, long time that the match of the day is Roger Federer versus Anybody. It's nice to know that at least on a given night that Nick can keep it together mentally and give the crowd what they are paying for. In this case he has done it all week...against albeit lesser players. But now is the moment of truth. He is up against an opponent who has the capability to playing like an immovable object. It will be interesting to see which Nick shows up. Dr. Jekyl or Mr. Hyde.



Comment