New Teaching Method: The Slice Backhand Part 1

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • John Yandell
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2005
    • 6883

    #1

    New Teaching Method: The Slice Backhand Part 1

    Would love to get your thoughts on my latest article, "New Teaching Method: The Slice Backhand Part 1"
  • doctorhl
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2015
    • 796

    #2
    A great article explaining the evolvement of the modern pro slice from the classic drive slice.Your style of laying a broad based, but scientific, foundational analysis is comprehensive enough to inform players from recreational to pro level to wisely select from “ best fit” models of a stroke. Most tennis websites do not put in the necessary research needed in order to enable the reader those informed opportunities. I am looking forward to see how all this will be put together in future articles as I feel that I am about halfway between the classic and pro slices. I feel like I occasionally come a little closer to these spin rates( ball skids low when I do), but..... I am not facing anyone hitting those high spin rates!

    Comment

    • John Yandell
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2005
      • 6883

      #3
      Doctor, Thanks for the thoughts and I couldn't agree more. I had to cut off most of them but I still get emails from a couple of know nothing miracle bullet coaches.

      Comment

      • jthb1021
        Senior Member
        • Mar 2012
        • 117

        #4
        I’m excited to learn from this series as well. I hope to better apply classic fundamentals with a better understanding of how and when to adapt and blend in the modern slice components.

        Comment

        • stotty
          Senior Member
          • Jan 2009
          • 6630

          #5
          What is the guidance on the finish on the follow through? Will the articles be walking us thru this? Blokes like me and John tend to finish with the tip of the racket pointing skyward. Roger finishes predominantly with the racket tip pointing downward toward the ground. Why is that? Is it a bi-product of the steep downward swing path? Some players use a combination of both finishes. I would like to know why that is and what we should be teaching as coaches.

          I'll be staying tuned for the answers....
          Stotty

          Comment

          • John Yandell
            Senior Member
            • Feb 2005
            • 6883

            #6
            These are the issues! You almost have written the conclusions!

            Comment

            • dpremsagar
              Junior Member
              • Dec 2013
              • 26

              #7
              I’m most curious about the initial point of the racquets forward motion, which is the same as the final point in the backswing.
              if the initial point and contact point are understood well everything may automatically fall into place.

              Comment

              • John Yandell
                Senior Member
                • Feb 2005
                • 6883

                #8
                Yeah good questions! But also how to do those points relate to the finish. Stay Tuned!

                Comment

                Who's Online

                Collapse

                There are currently 13392 users online. 18 members and 13374 guests.

                Most users ever online was 183,544 at 03:22 AM on 03-17-2025.

                Working...